IGF project 14153 N

Improvement of product quality and economy of industrial furnaces with protective gas atmosphere by optimization of the change of furnace atmosphere 

The importance of anne­al­ing pro­ces­ses under inert gas or reac­tion gas has been incre­asing for years. In par­ti­cu­lar, the requi­re­ments for the qua­li­ty of pro­cess gas atmo­sphe­res, espe­ci­al­ly for high­ly flamma­ble or flamma­ble pro­cess gases, are gene­ral­ly very high due to the requi­red per­so­nal and plant safety.

The flus­hing of the free fur­nace volu­me with non-com­bus­ti­ble gases to car­ry out a safe atmo­sphe­re chan­ge can be car­ri­ed out under all pro­cess con­di­ti­ons. The free fur­nace volu­me is pur­ged with pur­ge or pro­cess gas until the con­cen­tra­ti­on of the pro­cess-rele­vant gas com­pon­ents rea­ches the tar­get values with regard to safe­ty and quality.

The rese­arch objec­ti­ve is a deeper know­ledge of the atmo­sphe­re chan­ge in dis­con­ti­nuous­ly ope­ra­ted inert gas fur­naces. The aim is to ana­ly­se the effi­ci­en­cy of dif­fe­rent gas exch­an­ge stra­te­gies. This will make it pos­si­ble to iden­ti­fy influen­cing para­me­ters and incor­po­ra­te them into new con­cepts for atmo­sphe­re change.

The tar­get size is to redu­ce the requi­red spe­ci­fic gas quan­ti­ty and the pur­ging time (increase pro­duc­ti­vi­ty). The para­me­ters inves­ti­ga­ted are:

  • Arran­ge­ment and design of gas inlets and outlets,
  • pur­ge gas volu­me flow,
  • Pro­cess gas volu­me flow (volu­me flow cir­cu­la­ted by fan).

For this pur­po­se phy­si­cal and nume­ri­cal simu­la­ti­ons on cold models as well as inves­ti­ga­ti­ons on an indus­tri­al pro­tec­ti­ve gas cham­ber fur­nace have been performed.

The results of the labo­ra­to­ry tests wit­hout fan (forced cir­cu­la­ti­on) show that

  • inlet and out­let dia­me­ters have a very small influence on the atmo­sphe­ric chan­ge with the same spa­ti­al arrangement.
  • a spa­ti­al varia­ti­on of the inlets and out­lets has a con­sidera­ble influence on the forming flow struc­tures but due to the high tur­bu­lent mixing has only a small influence on the enti­re gas exch­an­ge, so that the cour­se of the atmo­sphe­ric chan­ge in all vari­ants has almost equa­li­zed up to θ = 5.

Labo­ra­to­ry tests with fans have shown that

  • with the gas cir­cu­la­tor run­ning, free con­vec­tion, cau­sed by tem­pe­ra­tu­re or con­cen­tra­ti­on gra­di­ents, plays a negli­gi­ble role in atmo­sphe­ric change.
  • the arran­ge­ment of the pur­ge gas inlets only plays a role at the begin­ning of the gas chan­ge; in the fur­ther cour­se of the stu­dy, all the vari­ants exami­ned converge.
  • the cir­cu­la­ted volu­me flow (gas cir­cu­la­tor) and the pur­ge gas volu­me flow also only have an influence at the begin­ning of the atmo­sphe­re change.

The ope­ra­ting tests on the inert gas cham­ber fur­nace show that

  • the atmo­sphe­re chan­ge under ope­ra­ting con­di­ti­ons (hot test) rea­ches the O2 safe­ty limit of 1 % within the 5‑fold safe­ty flus­hing quan­ti­ty θ = 5; this is not safe­ly achie­ved in the cold test.
  • a hig­her fur­nace tem­pe­ra­tu­re signi­fi­cant­ly acce­le­ra­tes the atmo­sphe­re change.

For secu­ri­ty reasons it must be noted that

  • just in the case of fur­naces that had been out of ope­ra­ti­on for lon­ger peri­ods, it must be noted that the fur­nace design and insu­la­ti­on can delay the first atmo­sphe­re chan­ge due to poor flow (dead space areas).
  • the moni­to­ring of 5 times the amount of safe­ty pur­ge gas (DIN-EN 746–3) is not suf­fi­ci­ent as a safe­ty cri­ter­ion for the atmo­sphe­re chan­ge. The addi­tio­nal moni­to­ring of safe­ty-rele­vant gas com­pon­ents is neces­sa­ry at cri­ti­cal locations.

Final report

Böl­ling, R.; Valen­te-Simoes, J.-P.; Pfei­fer, H.: Ver­bes­se­rung von Pro­dukt­qua­li­tät und Wirt­schaft­lich­keit von Indus­trie­öfen mit Schutz­gas­at­mo­sphä­re durch die Opti­mie­rung des Atmo­sphä­ren­wech­sels, FOGI-Nr. FV 679, For­schungs­ge­mein­schaft Indus­trie­ofen­bau e.V., Frankfurt


BMWi_Web_de_WBZ

This rese­arch pro­ject was appli­ed for by the For­schungs­ge­mein­schaft Indus­trie­ofen­bau e.V. via the For­schungs­ku­ra­to­ri­um Maschi­nen­bau e.V. and finan­ci­al­ly sup­port­ed by the Bun­des­mi­nis­te­ri­um für Wirt­schaft via the Arbeits­ge­mein­schaft indus­tri­el­ler For­schungs­ver­ei­ni­gun­gen e.V., AiF-Nr. 14153 N.